🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.