🔗 Share this article

Following a notable regulatory appeal, the Australian classification review board has overturned a prior decision that blocked Australian-based users from accessing recorded content of the shooting incident involving conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. This challenge was lodged by Elon Musk's social media platform, arguing against an order issued at the request of the national eSafety commissioner.

Details of the Original Classification Ruling

After the death of Charlie Kirk at a US campus in last year, the regulator petitioned the review board to assess and rate the circulating video. It first determined the content was "refused classification", a designation that empowered the regulator to order platforms to restrict access to the videos for an Australian audience.

The platform X challenged the decision for a pair of videos related to the Kirk incident. It also appealed a comparable ban on another piece of footage—showing the assault of Iryna Zarutska on a North Carolina train—which had likewise been deemed "refused classification".

The Platform's Case and Board's Decision

In its appeal, X asserted that the Kirk video contained only brief violence with no visible weapon. It was argued the recording was low-quality and the camera quickly panned away from the individual to the surrounding crowd.

X argued the video was not overly graphic, exploitative, or objectionable, adding that it served as a neutral objective record of "a notorious public event of public importance that generated extensive public discourse". X drew a parallel between the footage and the historic film of the JFK shooting.

Most members of the classification panel ultimately agreed that, "notwithstanding the heinous nature of the event," the video did not reach a level that was gratuitous, exploitative or offensive enough to justify a complete ban. However, they noted that a longer or clearer version with alternative commentary could have met that threshold. Consequently, the panel revised the classification of the content to R18+.

The Minority Viewpoint

Some on the panel held a contrary view, contending the video was "a shareable video for the probable aim of entertainment and/or personal gain (such as engagement metrics)". They also argued the parallel with the Zapruder JFK film was flawed, as the Kennedy video was made public years after the assassination, "once emotions around the matter had calmed".

Reactions to the Outcome

In a statement on its official policy channel, the platform welcomed the decision.

"X fought this case to uphold free speech and the critical nature of public access about issues of public interest. Our commitment remains dedicated to protecting these principles."

Representatives for the eSafety commissioner also welcomed the board's decision, but pointed out that the new R18+ rating now implies platforms "must take steps to prevent R18+ material being displayed to users who are minors".

Recent Developments on Violent Content

In related news, the regulator did not issue formal notices to platforms this week regarding disturbing videos from the recent Bondi beach terror attack shared across social media. Officials commented that while the content were distressing, they did not reach the high threshold for a "refused classification" rating.

As an alternative, the companies have been instructed to use sensitive content labels and interstitials, such as obscuring the image, on this material in line with their existing community guidelines.